Voters living in the 3rd District can choose this year between two candidates with strikingly different backgrounds. Will they choose Mark Schaeffer, a highly partisan commercial Realtor with past experience in construction who promises to control unchecked development, or Patti Drago, a nonpartisan retired businesswoman committed to balancing economic growth with preserving what’s best in Sussex?
The next council person faces significant challenges. Once a seasonal problem, Eastern Sussex now contends with traffic congestion on a daily basis and year-round. Development consumes open space at an amazing pace, altering forever the serene rural landscape that attracted so many transplants to the area.
Flooding is a recurring problem in some areas even as rising sea levels and worsening storms pose long-term threats. The quality of life seems to be declining before our eyes with little that anyone can do about it. Eastern Sussex fueled much of the county’s economic growth over the past three decades by supporting tourism and attracting retirees. Along with farming, these are the county economy’s most important drivers. Large landowners, developers, builders, and Realtors have profited from the many new residents and the growth of tourist-based businesses.
When it comes to controlling growth, Schaeffer’s argument seems to be “It takes one to know one.” That is, as a Realtor with experience in construction, he can help the council work more effectively with the interests that drive Sussex growth while also contributing to its problems.
But another adage suggests the need for caution: “Don’t let a fox guard the henhouse.” It’s not impossible that a Realtor can rise above conflicts of interest to exercise control, but is it probable? Schaeffer’s deep Republican ties ensure that he will become part of the same governing group that has helped usher in the very problems that now require attention. For evidence, see the recent endorsement from current council member John Rieley in the Cape Gazette of Oct. 16.
Patti Drago lacks any such conflicts that would limit her independence, either professional or partisan. She has demonstrated her willingness to tackle tough problems throughout her career in business and her community activism since moving to Sussex. Letters to the editor testify to her personal commitment and strong work ethic. Much of what Julianne Murray has said about her own candidacy for governor applies to Patti Drago, as well: “A fresh approach is needed…Delaware does not need more of the same, it needs someone with ex perience in the private sector who will be beholden to the people and not the special interests.” (Cape Gazette Oct. 16 p. 52)
Write in Patti Drago’s name on Nov. 3.
-
A letter to the editor expresses a reader's opinion and, as such, is not reflective of the editorial opinions of this newspaper.
To submit a letter to the editor for publishing, send an email to viewpoints@capegazette.com. All letters are considered at the discretion of the newsroom and published as space allows. Due to the large volume of submissions, we cannot acknowledge receipt of each submission. Letters must include a phone number and address for verification. Keep letters to 400 words or fewer. We reserve the right to edit for content or length. Letters should be responsive to issues addressed in the Cape Gazette rather than content from other publications or media. Letters should focus on local issues, not national topics or personalities. Only one letter per author will be published every 30 days regarding a particular topic. Authors may submit a second letter within that time period if it pertains to a different issue. Letters may not be critical of personalities or specific businesses. Criticism of public figures is permissible. Endorsement letters for political candidates are no longer accepted. Letters must be the author’s original work, and may not be generated by artificial intelligence tools. Templates, form letters and letters containing language similar to other submissions will not be published.
