Share: 

Pilottown Village shooting self in foot

July 23, 2015

The Lewes Planning Commission deserves praise for taking a stand against the planned cul-de-sacs presented by Jack Lingo Asset Management. Also many thanks to Nick Roth for his well-written article dated July 8 in the Cape Gazette. There is a petition circulating opposing the through street and I will not be signing it for the following reasons.

A through street would increase the value of properties in Pilottown Village. Property values are all about location, and we know that short and easy access to the beach and to the center of Lewes adds value to the property. Property owners in PV are shooting themselves in the foot by opposing this thru-road.

The concern of excess traffic in PV is pure speculation. PV does not have a traffic problem. This cul-de-sac plan would actually force the 14+/- homes at Seagull to go through PV.

It makes more sense for them to exit onto 4th street which directly connects with New Road and is a short cut to beach and town. Emergency vehicles trying to reach Canary, Seagull and Blue Heron are forced to travel an extra two miles, which could be a life or death situation, especially in high season at the beach.

These proposed cul-de-sacs are not designed for privacy or for children’s play. They are there because wetlands prevent the builder from putting in a through road without sacrificing some profit, at the expense of the surrounding community.

Altering this plan to eliminate three lots is not unreasonable and must be required if this undesirable development is to be realized.

Nick Hammonds, principal at Jack Lingo Asset Management, stated that the developer has exhausted its options. The plan is so badly thought out that this statement cannot be taken seriously.

Ann Nolan
Lewes

 

 

  • A letter to the editor expresses a reader's opinion and, as such, is not reflective of the editorial opinions of this newspaper.

    To submit a letter to the editor for publishing, send an email to viewpoints@capegazette.com. All letters are considered at the discretion of the newsroom and published as space allows. Due to the large volume of submissions, we cannot acknowledge receipt of each submission. Letters must include a phone number and address for verification. Keep letters to 400 words or fewer. We reserve the right to edit for content or length. Letters should be responsive to issues addressed in the Cape Gazette rather than content from other publications or media. Letters should focus on local issues, not national topics or personalities. Only one letter per author will be published every 30 days regarding a particular topic. Authors may submit a second letter within that time period if it pertains to a different issue. Letters may not be critical of personalities or specific businesses. Criticism of public figures is permissible. Endorsement letters for political candidates are no longer accepted. Letters must be the author’s original work, and may not be generated by artificial intelligence tools. Templates, form letters and letters containing language similar to other submissions will not be published.